State v. Martinez

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Nathan Daniel Martinez, Appellant. Appellate…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 29, 2020

2020-UP-025 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 29, 2020)

Opinion

2020-UP-025

01-29-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Nathan Daniel Martinez, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002494

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Nathan Daniel Martinez, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2020

Appeal From Richland County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Nathan Daniel Martinez, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. ^[1]

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

THOMAS, GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.