From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marshall-Limoges

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

rejecting request this court extend requirement to consider Miller factors to the imposition of any prison sentence on a juvenile defendant

Summary of this case from State v. Means

Opinion

No. 14–1610.

08-19-2015

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Michael Daryl MARSHALL–LIMOGES, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Maria Ruhtenberg, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik and Linda J. Hines, Assistant Attorneys General, Patrick A. Jennings, County Attorney, and Terry Ganzel and Mark Campbell, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Marshall-Limoges

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Aug 19, 2015
871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

rejecting request this court extend requirement to consider Miller factors to the imposition of any prison sentence on a juvenile defendant

Summary of this case from State v. Means
Case details for

State v. Marshall-Limoges

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Michael Daryl MARSHALL–LIMOGES…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Aug 19, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 521 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

State v. Means

It is appropriate for our court to defer to the supreme court on whether to extend the holdings of Null,…

State v. Hudson

”); State v. Means, No. 141376, 2015 WL 6509741, at *9 (Iowa Ct.App. Oct. 28, 2015) (“It is appropriate for…