From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 3, 2012
303 Conn. 933 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-3

STATE of Connecticut v. FERDINAND R.

Martin Zeldis, public defender, in support of the petition. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Martin Zeldis, public defender, in support of the petition. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 594, 33 A.3d 793 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 53a–70b requires that the defendant have a general intent to commit the act that constituted a violation of the statute?”


Summaries of

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 3, 2012
303 Conn. 933 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Charles MARSHALL.State of Connecticut v. Richard…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

303 Conn. 933 (Conn. 2012)
36 A.3d 693

Citing Cases

State v. Marshall

The defendant is also known as Richard Marshall. See State v. Marshall , 132 Conn. App. 718, 720 n.1, 33 A.3d…

Marshall v. Berone

The petitioner challenges his state conviction, following a trial to the court, of one count of burglary in…