From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Marknsen

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Dec 19, 2016
No. 73762-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016)

Opinion

73762-7-I

12-19-2016

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL MARKNSEN, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DWYER, J.

As the parties predicted, the Supreme Court's opinion in State v. Case, No. 92293-4 (Wash. Dec. 8, 2016), http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/922934.pdf, is dispositive of the claim of error raised in this appeal. The Case decision mandates affirmance of the trial court's judgment. We so order.

The sole remaining question regards costs on appeal. This question was fully briefed by the parties (it was raised in the brief of appellant, addressed in the brief of respondent, and discussed in appellant's reply brief) and we granted oral argument on the issue. After full consideration of the question, "we now choose to exercise our discretion and direct the clerk of the court not to award appellate costs even though the State has substantially prevailed." In re Pers. Restraint of Flippo, No. 92616-6 (Wash. Dec. 8, 2016), at 8, http://www.courts.wa.aov/opinions/pdf/926166.pdf.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Marknsen

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Dec 19, 2016
No. 73762-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Marknsen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL MARKNSEN, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 19, 2016

Citations

No. 73762-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2016)