From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Manrique

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 3, 1976
545 P.2d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. C73-07-2205 Cr, CA 4973

Argued January 22, 1976.

Remanded with directions February 3, 1976.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, William M. Dale, Judge.

Robert C. Cannon, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Thornton, Judges.

Remanded with directions.


PER CURIAM.



Defendant, upon retrial, State v. Manrique, 270 Or. 201, 531 P.2d 239 (1975), was convicted of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, and sentenced to five years in the penitentiary. On appeal he makes two assignments of error.

The first assignment does not warrant discussion. The second concerns the failure of the judgment order to recite that defendant was to receive credit for time served pursuant to his initial conviction. The state concedes that defendant is correct and, in fact, has already caused his records to be corrected accordingly. We think it desirable, however, that the judgment order itself recite defendant's entitlement.

Remanded for entry of an appropriate order.



Summaries of

State v. Manrique

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 3, 1976
545 P.2d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

State v. Manrique

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SANTIAGO MARQUEZ MANRIQUE, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1976

Citations

545 P.2d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 1976)
545 P.2d 603

Citing Cases

State v. Yost

Such an order was not permissible under the facts of this case. State v. Stevens, 253 Or. 563, 456 P.2d 494…