From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Manfredi

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 28, 1985
493 A.2d 242 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)

Opinion

(4170) (4171)

Argued May 28, 1985

Decision released May 28, 1985

This opinion was released from the bench following argument.
Reporter of Judicial Decisions

Motion by the defendant and by his minor children for an order of closure of the hearing on the defendant's motion for modification of the conditions of his pretrial release, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, where the court, E. O'Connell, J., granted the motion and Post-Newsweek Stations of Connecticut, Inc., and The Hartford Courant Company filed separate appeals to this court. Error; further proceedings.

J. Charles Mokriski, for the appellant (Post-Newsweek Stations of Connecticut, Inc.).

Ralph G. Elliot, for the appellant (The Hartford Courant).

William J. Gallitto, for the appellee (defendant).

Kathleen B. Martin, for the appellees (defendant's minor children).

James A. Armentano filed a brief for Margaret B. and William T. Jones, temporary guardians of the minor children.

Herbert G. Appleton, assistant state's attorney, for the state.


On the basis of the record presented to us, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting the closure order without holding an evidentiary hearing in accordance with the procedure and principles enunciated in State v. Couture, 37 Conn. Sup. 705, 435 A.2d 369 (1981). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is set aside and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

State v. Manfredi

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 28, 1985
493 A.2d 242 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
Case details for

State v. Manfredi

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RUSSELL MANFREDI

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 28, 1985

Citations

493 A.2d 242 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
493 A.2d 242

Citing Cases

State v. Kelly

Ordinarily, however, specific findings are made after an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Manfredi, 4 Conn.…

Doe v. Hartford Rc. Diocesan Corp.

Practice Book § 11-20(c) mandates that the trial court articulate on the record in open court the overriding…