From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Malmister

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 2020
Appellate Case No. 2018-000333 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000333 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-049

02-19-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Wesley Charles Malmister, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Anderson County
R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Malmister

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 2020
Appellate Case No. 2018-000333 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Malmister

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Wesley Charles Malmister, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 19, 2020

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2018-000333 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2020)