From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mahoney

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jul 25, 1902
24 R.I. 338 (R.I. 1902)

Opinion

July 25, 1902.

PRESENT: Stiness, C.J., Tillinghast and Blodgett JJ.

(1) Indictments. Practice, Criminal Law. An indictment charging the violation of a statute which fails to specifically negative the exceptions from the prohibitions of the statute is bad on demurrer.

INDICTMENT charging defendant with a violation of Gen. Laws cap. 152, § 8, of medicines and poisons. Heard on demurrer, and demurrer sustained.

Charles F. Stearns, Attorney-General, for State.

John W. Hogan, for defendant.


The court is of the opinion that the exceptions from the prohibitions of the statute should be specifically negatived, since the allegations in the indictment may all be true and the respondent nevertheless may be within the exceptions contained in section 8 of chapter 152.

Demurrer sustained.


Summaries of

State v. Mahoney

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Jul 25, 1902
24 R.I. 338 (R.I. 1902)
Case details for

State v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:STATE vs. HENRY MAHONEY

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Jul 25, 1902

Citations

24 R.I. 338 (R.I. 1902)
53 A. 124

Citing Cases

State v. Flanagan

It is evident that the exceptions were intended to be matters of defence only. The defendant also relies on…

Ex Parte Hornef

(See, also, State v. Fuller, 33 N.H. 259.) On the other hand, in State v. Mahony, 24 R.I. 338, [ 53 A. 124],…