From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2019
2019-UP-342 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-342

10-09-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Marcus Antonio Mack, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001842

Appellate Defenders LaNelle Cantey DuRant and Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2019

Appeal From Lexington County Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defenders LaNelle Cantey DuRant and Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2019
2019-UP-342 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Marcus Antonio Mack, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-342 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)