From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lynch

COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE
Oct 8, 1915
96 A. 32 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1915)

Opinion

10-08-1915

STATE v. LYNCH.

Frank M. Jones, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State. Robert C. White and James M. Tunnell, both of Georgetown, for accused.


Arthur Lynch was indicted for the unlawful sale of malt liquor, to wit, beer. Jury disagreed.

Argued before BOYCE and RICE, JJ.

Frank M. Jones, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State. Robert C. White and James M. Tunnell, both of Georgetown, for accused.

The accused admitted that he sold "soft or near beer" to the prosecuting witness, but denied that he sold to him malt liquor or lager beer.

BOYCE, J., in charging the jury, said, inter alia:

Malt liquor, or beer, as is commonly known, is a brewed liquor made of grain, especially barley, flavored with hops, and is a liquor which has undergone fermentation, and contains alcohol. 5 Cyc. 678. The sale of such liquor is prohibited in this county by what is known as the Local Option Law.

Proof of the sale of such liquor will sustain the indictment.

Jury disagreed.


Summaries of

State v. Lynch

COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE
Oct 8, 1915
96 A. 32 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1915)
Case details for

State v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. LYNCH.

Court:COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF DELAWARE

Date published: Oct 8, 1915

Citations

96 A. 32 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1915)
5 Boyce 569

Citing Cases

State v. Welsh

See Article by A. Loth, "An Outline of Iowa Codes, Compilations and Revisions", 3 I.C.A., p. VII at XIV-XVI.…

Hall v. State

It makes no mention of any alcoholic content. It seems to have proceeded on the ground that if it was…