From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Love

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Sep 19, 2001
Appeal No. C-000757, Trial No. B-0003911, B-0004600, B-0005961, B-0006525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2001)

Opinion

Appeal No. C-000757, Trial No. B-0003911, B-0004600, B-0005961, B-0006525.

September 19, 2001.


JUDGMENT ENTRY.

This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).

We overrule the appellant's sole assignment of error, in which he challenges the denial of his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Based upon the record of the hearing on the motion, we are unable to conclude that the common pleas court, in denying the motion, abused its discretion. See State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521, 584 N.E.2d 715, paragraph two of the syllabus.

Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Hildebrandt, P.J., Winkler and Shannon, JJ.

Raymond E. Shannon, retired, from the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.


Summaries of

State v. Love

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
Sep 19, 2001
Appeal No. C-000757, Trial No. B-0003911, B-0004600, B-0005961, B-0006525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2001)
Case details for

State v. Love

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMOND LOVE, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County

Date published: Sep 19, 2001

Citations

Appeal No. C-000757, Trial No. B-0003911, B-0004600, B-0005961, B-0006525 (Ohio Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2001)