State v. Love

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Prentiss Love, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 21, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-212037 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 21, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212037 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-195

05-21-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Prentiss Love, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Prentiss Love, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Georgetown County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Prentiss Love, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.