From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Loudenback

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Ashtabula County
Feb 12, 1999
Case No. 98-A-0023 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1999)

Opinion

Case No. 98-A-0023.

February 12, 1999.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 13224.

THOMAS L. SARTINI, ASHTABULA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, LINDA G. SILAKOSKI, ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, (For Plaintiff-Appellant).

WILLIAM E. McCARTHY, ASHTABULA COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER, DENNIS M. REID, ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER, (For Defendant-Appellee).

JUDGES

HON. DONALD R. FORD, P.J.,

HON. ROBERT A. NADER, J.,

HON. WILLIAM M. O'NEILL, J.


OPINION


On March 14, 1991, appellee, Terry Allen Loudenback, pleaded guilty to three counts of rape, one count in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), and two counts in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b). In a judgment entry filed on April 26, 1991, the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas sentenced appellant to an indefinite term of ten to twenty-five years on each count, the sentences to be served concurrently. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections sought to have appellee adjudicated a sexual predator pursuant to Ohio's version of Megan's Law, recently amended R.C. Chapter 2950. In a judgment entry filed on February 6, 1998, the trial court dismissed the sexual predator proceedings, holding that the sexual predator provisions of R.C. Chapter 2950 are unconstitutional. Appellant, the State of Ohio, timely appealed, asserting that R.C. Chapter 2950, as amended is constitutional.

Based on the precedent established by the majority of this court in State v. Williams (Jan. 29, 1999), Lake App. No. 97-L-191, unreported, although this writer interposed a dissent to the majority's mandate there that R.C. Chapter 2950 was constitutionally void as applied to sexual predators under Section 1, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, it is clear that the decision in the Williams case controls the outcome here. Hence, I defer to the present controlling authority in this appellate district on the issues raised in this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. _______________________________________ PRESIDING JUDGE DONALD R. FORD

NADER, J.,

O'NEILL, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Loudenback

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Ashtabula County
Feb 12, 1999
Case No. 98-A-0023 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1999)
Case details for

State v. Loudenback

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TERRY ALLEN LOUDENBACK…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Ashtabula County

Date published: Feb 12, 1999

Citations

Case No. 98-A-0023 (Ohio Ct. App. Feb. 12, 1999)