From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Livingston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-376 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-376 Appellate Case 2018-001595

11-03-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Marquille Rondale Livingston, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Marquille Rondale Livingston, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2021

Appeal From Richland County Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Marquille Rondale Livingston, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur


Summaries of

State v. Livingston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-376 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Livingston

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Marquille Rondale Livingston, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-376 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)