From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lingle

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 28, 1986
483 So. 2d 608 (La. 1986)

Opinion

No. 82-KK-2864.

February 28, 1986.


The suggestion that the alerting of the defendant by the investigation officers of his status as a possible suspect in the homicide is relevant to the manner in which the magistrate scrutinizes the affidavit for probable cause is insupportable. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), does not even imply that the magistrate should in any way consider this factor. Furthermore, the majority's observation, that the "identification and apprehension of the offender needed to be accomplished with all possible haste" is irrelevant to the issue at hand: whether the magistrate had sufficient information from the reconstructed affidavit to support the finding of probable cause.


Summaries of

State v. Lingle

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 28, 1986
483 So. 2d 608 (La. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Lingle

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. SCOTT LINGLE

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 28, 1986

Citations

483 So. 2d 608 (La. 1986)