From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Linen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-116 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-116 Appellate Case 2019-001947

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. John Nathan Linen, II, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and John Nathan Linen, II, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2022

Appeal From Georgetown County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and John Nathan Linen, II, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J, and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Linen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-116 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Linen

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. John Nathan Linen, II, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-116 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)