From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lindemann

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Aug 12, 2015
358 P.3d 328 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

accepting state concession that trial court erred in imposing $60 "mandatory state amount" because the court lacked statutory authority to impose those fees

Summary of this case from State v. Sasser

Opinion

No. 368 A155636

08-12-2015

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HENRY A. LINDEMANN, aka Heinz Lindemann, Defendant-Appellant.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Susan Reid, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Lincoln County Circuit Court
131354;
Sheryl Bachart, Judge. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Susan Reid, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge. PER CURIAM Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction reversed; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged, ORS 811.700; failure to appear on a criminal citation, ORS 133.076; and second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. We reject without written discussion defendant's first and second assignments of error and write only to address his third assignment, which challenges the trial court's imposition ofa $60 "mandatory state amount" for each conviction. Defendant points out that the trial court imposed fines of $500 or $250 for each conviction, as allowed by ORS 153.633, and argues that there is no statutory authority to separately impose additional fines. The state concedes that the $60 "mandatory state amount" fees were imposed in error. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the portion of the judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction.

ORS 153.633(1) provides:

"In any criminal action in a circuit court in which a fine is imposed, the lesser of the following amounts is payable to the state before any other distribution of the fine is made:
"(a) $60; or
"(b) The amount of the fine if the fine is less than $60."

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Defendant observes that the statute does not provide authority for the trial court to impose a fee but, rather, directs the first $60 (or the entire fine if less than $60) of whatever fine is imposed to be paid to the state.


Summaries of

State v. Lindemann

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Aug 12, 2015
358 P.3d 328 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)

accepting state concession that trial court erred in imposing $60 "mandatory state amount" because the court lacked statutory authority to impose those fees

Summary of this case from State v. Sasser
Case details for

State v. Lindemann

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HENRY A. LINDEMANN, aka Heinz…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 12, 2015

Citations

358 P.3d 328 (Or. Ct. App. 2015)
272 Or. App. 780

Citing Cases

State v. Machado

The state agrees, noting that ORS 153.633 “directs the first $60 of any fine imposed to go to the state, but…

State v. Wiggins

We agree, accept the state's concession, and note that, when the court resentences defendant, this term…