From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lewis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2016
NO. 15-KK-2256 (La. Apr. 4, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 15-KK-2256

04-04-2016

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMES J. LEWIS


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

I agree with the Per Curiam and write separately to emphasize the care in which courts should—and do—address the issue of confidential informant disclosure and its essential and delicate role in the administration of criminal justice.

Our laws and jurisprudence generally provide for the protection of the identity of a confidential informant. However, as noted in the Per Curiam, under pronouncements of both the United States Supreme Court and this Court, the requirements of due process and the particular circumstances of this case warrant pretrial disclosure of the informant's identity. The district attorney is therefore faced with two choices: (1) provide pretrial disclosure of the identity of the confidential informant; or (2) exercise discretion under C.Cr.P. art. 61 and dismiss the case.


Summaries of

State v. Lewis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2016
NO. 15-KK-2256 (La. Apr. 4, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMES J. LEWIS

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 4, 2016

Citations

NO. 15-KK-2256 (La. Apr. 4, 2016)