From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lance

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 25, 1998
701 N.E.2d 692 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 98-603 and 98-605

Submitted October 13, 1998.

Decided November 25, 1998.

CERTIFIED by and APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970306.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sherry Green, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Schuh Goldberg and Raul E. Tellez, for appellant.


The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in part and dissent in part.


I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V.

MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Lance

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 25, 1998
701 N.E.2d 692 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State v. Lance

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LANCE, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 25, 1998

Citations

701 N.E.2d 692 (Ohio 1998)
701 N.E.2d 692

Citing Cases

State v. Russell

See Appendix.State v. Lance (Feb. 13, 1998), Hamilton App. Nos. C-970301, C-970282, C-970283, unreported,…

State v. Kachermeyer

Therefore, we find that appellant cannot show that the trial court's sexual predator determination would have…