From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 20, 2020
303 So. 3d 292 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2020-KH-00627

10-20-2020

STATE of Louisiana v. Jackie LAMBERT


PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant shows no entitlement to DNA testing. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 926.1. Applicant has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct 20, 2020
303 So. 3d 292 (La. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Lambert

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Louisiana v. Jackie LAMBERT

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Oct 20, 2020

Citations

303 So. 3d 292 (La. 2020)