From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. L.A.B.

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 16, 2022
170 Ohio St. 3d 193 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

No. 2022-0085

12-16-2022

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. L.A.B., Appellant.

G. Gary Tyack, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberly M. Bond, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Timothy B. Hackett, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.


G. Gary Tyack, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberly M. Bond, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Timothy B. Hackett, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

{¶ 1} This case is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority with regard to the issue raised in proposition of law No. I (whether the state may criminally indict a juvenile on counts for which the state failed to show probable cause in the juvenile court) except by the parties inter se.

Donnelly, J., concurs.

Kennedy and Fischer, JJ., concur but would not order that the opinion of the court of appeals not be cited.

O'Connor, C.J., and Stewart and Brunner, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part and would affirm the court of appeals’ judgment as to proposition of law Nos. II, III, and IV.

DeWine, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and would order oral argument on proposition of law No. I.


Summaries of

State v. L.A.B.

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 16, 2022
170 Ohio St. 3d 193 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

State v. L.A.B.

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. L.A.B., Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

Citations

170 Ohio St. 3d 193 (Ohio 2022)
209 N.E.3d 699