State v. Kotz

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Bartusek

    383 N.W.2d 582 (Iowa 1986)   Cited 8 times

    Trial court correctly determined when Iowa Code section 321A.32(1) was applicable. See State v. Kotz, 337 N.W.2d 530, 531-32 (Iowa 1983); State v. Sonderleiter, 251 Iowa 106, 109, 99 N.W.2d 393, 395-96 (1959). That section provides:

  2. State v. Jost

    219 Neb. 162 (Neb. 1985)   Cited 16 times
    Determining that in driving under suspension case, state needs only prove that defendant operated a motor vehicle on a public highway when his driver's license or operator's privileges had been taken way by some lawful authority

    Any distinction in the statutes is not based upon the prohibited misconduct, which in essence is identical and equally offensive under the statutes discussed. In State v. Kotz, 337 N.W.2d 530 (Iowa 1983), the Supreme Court of Iowa held that a defendant can be prosecuted and convicted on a charge of driving under license suspension, although such defendant's license had been revoked, not suspended. In Kotz the court found every pertinent point in the Iowa statute prohibiting driving during a suspended license was also included in the statute prohibiting driving during revocation of a license.