Opinion
Submitted February 12, 1926 —
Decided April 8, 1926.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 1241.
For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow.
For the plaintiff in error, Harry Simandl.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.