State v. Knighton

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Richard Knighton, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

No. 2024-UP-095 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-095 Appellate Case 2021-001048

03-27-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Richard Knighton, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2024.

Appeal From Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.