From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Knatt

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
Sep 12, 2017
Docket Number: 17 00572-KW (La. Ct. App. Sep. 12, 2017)

Opinion

Docket Number: 17 00572-KW

09-12-2017

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. PAUL KNATT, III

Hon. M. Bofill Duhe District Attorney 300 Iberia St., #200 New Iberia LA 70560 W. Claire Howington Iberia Parish ADA 300 Iberia St. Ste 200 New Iberia La 70560 cc: Harry Daniels, III, Counsel for the Respondent


NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Hon. M. Bofill Duhe
District Attorney
300 Iberia St., #200
New Iberia LA 70560

W. Claire Howington
Iberia Parish ADA
300 Iberia St. Ste 200
New Iberia La 70560

Writ Application from Iberia Parish Case No. 11-CR-1790

BEFORE JUDGES: Hon. John D. Saunders Hon. Phyllis M. Keaty Hon. Candyce G. Perret

As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the ruling on the application for rehearing filed by State of Louisiana is:

REHEARING DENIED. The State fails to show the untimely filing of the writ application was not due to its own fault as required by Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal Rule 4-3. Tracking information obtained from the receipt submitted with the State's rehearing application showed the package was dropped off after the final pickup occurred for that FedEx location. Thus, the package was not mailed until the next day. Accordingly, the receipt submitted with the State's writ application was not made at the time of mailing as required by Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal Rule 2-13.

cc: Harry Daniels, III, Counsel for the Respondent


Summaries of

State v. Knatt

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
Sep 12, 2017
Docket Number: 17 00572-KW (La. Ct. App. Sep. 12, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Knatt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. PAUL KNATT, III

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 12, 2017

Citations

Docket Number: 17 00572-KW (La. Ct. App. Sep. 12, 2017)