State v. King

4 Citing cases

  1. Gaither v. Carpenter

    55 S.E. 625 (N.C. 1906)   Cited 17 times

    When he does not do this, but merely sends up the appellant's case with the appellee's exceptions and Judge's order, there is strictly no `case settled,' and the Court in its discretion (there being no errors upon the face of the record) may, ex mero motu, either affirm the judgment or remand the case." Mitchell v. Tedder, 107 N.C. 358; Hinton v. Greenleaf, 115 N.C. 5; State v. King, 119 N.C. 910. When counsel do not agree upon a case, only the "case settled" by the Judge should come up in the record.

  2. Hinton v. Greenleaf

    20 S.E. 162 (N.C. 1894)   Cited 4 times

    Remanded. Cited: McDaniel v. Scurlock, 115 N.C. 297; S. v. King, 119 N.C. 910; Stevens v. Smathers, 123 N.C. 499; Gaither v. Carpenter, 143 N.C. 241. (7)

  3. Arrington v. Arrington

    19 S.E. 145 (N.C. 1894)   Cited 4 times

    Remanded. Cited: McDaniel v. Scurlock, 115 N.C. 297; Causey v. Snow, 116 N.C. 498; S. v. King, 119 N.C. 910; Stevens v. Smathers, 123 N.C. 499.

  4. Russell v. Davis

    5 S.E. 895 (N.C. 1888)   Cited 12 times
    In Russell v. Davis, 99 N.C. 115, the Court say: "If the appellee files no exceptions to the appellant's statement, it will be treated as the case on appeal; if the appellee files exceptions and the appellant fails to have the case settled by the judge, the exceptions will be treated as amendments to the case."

    Certiorari granted. Cited: Mitchell v. Haggard, 105 N.C. 174; Simmons v. Andrews, 106 N.C. 203, 204 Booth v. Ratcliff, 107 N.C. 8; S. v. Carlton, ibid., 957; S. v. Price, 110 N.C. 600; Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N.C. 116; McDaniel v. Scurlock, 115 N.C. 297; S. v. King, 119 N.C. 910; Stevens v. Smathers, 123 N.C. 498.