From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kinard

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 18, 2020
429 S.C. 614 (S.C. 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-001604 Opinion No. 27955

03-18-2020

The STATE of South Carolina, Petitioner, v. Tony Latrell KINARD, Respondent.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, all for Petitioner. Richard James Dolce, of Richard J. Dolce, Attorney at Law, and Michael Vincent Laubshire, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, all for Petitioner.

Richard James Dolce, of Richard J. Dolce, Attorney at Law, and Michael Vincent Laubshire, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Kinard , 427 S.C. 367, 831 S.E.2d 138 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Kinard

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 18, 2020
429 S.C. 614 (S.C. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Kinard

Case Details

Full title:The State of South Carolina, Petitioner, v. Tony Latrell Kinard…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 18, 2020

Citations

429 S.C. 614 (S.C. 2020)
840 S.E.2d 924

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

The State therefore contends that even if a defendant is not seen on the video recording while being advised…