From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Kimble

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 14, 1986
481 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-2205.

January 14, 1986.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Dade County; Herbert M. Klein, Judge.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


ON CONFESSION OF ERROR


After receiving a confession of error filed by the public defender, the court afforded the appellee an opportunity to respond to the appeal, see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); he has not done so. Upon our own examination of the record and the brief of appellant, we conclude that the trial court's downward departure from the sentencing guidelines was plainly unjustified under the controlling authority of State v. Caride, 473 So.2d 1362, 1363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which involved an identical situation. Accordingly, the sentence imposed below is vacated and the cause remanded with directions to permit the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Caride was decided subsequent to the sentencing in this case.

Because further proceedings are required below in which Kimble will require the services of the public defender, we think no purpose will be served by granting the appellate motion to withdraw.


Summaries of

State v. Kimble

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 14, 1986
481 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Kimble

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. GURLEY KIMBLE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 14, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)