From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Keith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 1999
732 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-2855

Opinion filed April 21, 1999.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leon M. Firtel, Judge, L.T. No. 97-40686.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Wendy Benner-Leon and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioner.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender, for respondent.

Before NESBITT, FLETCHER, and SHEVIN, JJ.


We grant the State's petition for writ of certiorari and quash the pretrial order of the trial court which requires the prosecution to elect only one of the two charges against the defendant on which to proceed to trial and to dismiss the remaining charge. The order on review departs from the essential requirements of law by unnecessarily and prematurely interfering with prosecutorial discretion in the charging area, see State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); see also Alexander v. State, 470 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Ridley v. State, 407 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), and therefore cannot stand.

The basis of the order was a finding that defendant could not be convicted of both charges without violation of the double jeopardy rule. Making no judgment on the legal validity of this finding, we agree with the State that the order is premature because jeopardy has not yet attached in this case. See Brown v. State, 367 So.2d 616 (Fla. 1979).

Petition granted, order quashed.


Summaries of

State v. Keith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 21, 1999
732 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Keith

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. HUGH KEITH, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 21, 1999

Citations

732 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. Roberson

Johnson v. State, 685 So.2d 1369, 1370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). A dismissal of multiple counts in an information…

State v. Farnham

However, our courts have ruled that a dismissal of charges based upon double jeopardy is premature because…