From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Mar 26, 2013
436 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 98192.

2013-03-26

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas JONES, Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Theresa Burke, Judge. Jeannie M. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Shaun Morgan, Office of the Circuit Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Theresa Burke, Judge.
Jeannie M. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Shaun Morgan, Office of the Circuit Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Jones (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment following his conviction of possession of drug paraphernalia, Section 195.233 RSMo.

Defendant argues the trial court: (1) clearly erred in overruling his motion to suppress syringes and the burnt bottom of a soda can, and (2) abused its discretion in sustaining motions to strike two veniremembers for cause.

All statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the 221reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).




Summaries of

State v. Jones

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Mar 26, 2013
436 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas JONES, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

436 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)