From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jones

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1992
113 Or. App. 228 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

In State v. Jones, 113 Or. App. 228, 832 P.2d 459, on recon 116 Or. App. 393, 842 P.2d 419, mod 117 Or. App. 174,842 P.2d 466 (1992), the trial court, when imposing sentence, also denied the defendant credit for time served.

Summary of this case from State v. Bullock

Opinion

90C-20365; CA A68211

Argued and submitted February 28, 1992

Convictions affirmed; judgment vacated in part; sentence for rape in first degree vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed May 20, 1992 Reconsideration allowed by opinion November 12, 1992 See 116 Or. App. 393 (1992)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Robert B. McConville, Judge.

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Convictions affirmed; judgment provision denying credit for time served vacated; sentence for rape in first degree vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was found guilty of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, and rape in the second degree. ORS 163.365. He first argues that the 20-year sentence imposed under ORS 137.635 for the first-degree rape conviction exceeded the maximum permissible under the sentencing guidelines. For the reasons set out in State v. Haydon, 113 Or. App. 205, 832 P.2d 457 (1992), we agree.

Defendant also argues that the sentencing court erred in specifically denying him credit for time served. The state responds that he made no showing of the length of his pretrial incarceration or whether any of the pretrial detention was based solely on the pendency of these charges. ORS 137.370(2)(a).

ORS 137.320 provides that the Department of Corrections shall compute a defendant's sentence and give credit for presentence time served. It does not authorize the sentencing court to order credit for time served. Nissel v. Pearce, 307 Or. 102, 105, 764 P.2d 224 (1988); see State v. McClure, 295 Or. 732, 670 P.2d 1009 (1983); State v. Rudy, 43 Or. App. 635, 603 P.2d 1230 (1979). The guidelines did not change ORS 137.320. We agree that, by negative implication, sentencing courts have no authority to deny credit for time served to which a defendant is statutorily entitled. Insofar as the judgment purports to do so, it is invalid.

Convictions affirmed; judgment provision denying credit for time served vacated; sentence for rape in the first degree vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Jones

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1992
113 Or. App. 228 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

In State v. Jones, 113 Or. App. 228, 832 P.2d 459, on recon 116 Or. App. 393, 842 P.2d 419, mod 117 Or. App. 174,842 P.2d 466 (1992), the trial court, when imposing sentence, also denied the defendant credit for time served.

Summary of this case from State v. Bullock
Case details for

State v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDREW JONES, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 12, 1992

Citations

113 Or. App. 228 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
832 P.2d 459

Citing Cases

State v. Bullock

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed, arguing that the trial court did not have authority to deny him…

State v. Phaneuf

We have consistently held that a trial court lacks authority to deny credit for time served to which a…