From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Courts of General Sessions and Oyer and Terminer of Delaware
Jan 1, 1854
5 Del. 507 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1854)

Opinion

Fall Sessions, 1854.


THE defendant was tried at the Sussex spring sessions, 1853, for breaking and entering a store house and stealing certain goods therefrom.

A confession of the prisoner, made before the magistrate, was offered in evidence and objected to, unless the State first proved that it was not reduced to writing.

The Court said, that it was the magistrate's duty in the case to reduce the prisoner's confession to writing and read it to him, and offer it for his signature. ( Code, 2028.) That the court would presume this to have been done; (3 Harr. Rep., 554;) but this would not of itself exclude parol evidence of the confession. It was the recognition of the written statement by the prisoner's signature, which made it better evidence than parol proof, and this was a fact not to be presumed, but to be proved, in order to exclude the parol evidence.

Evidence admitted.


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Courts of General Sessions and Oyer and Terminer of Delaware
Jan 1, 1854
5 Del. 507 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1854)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE vs. THOMAS JOHNSON, (Free Negro.)

Court:Courts of General Sessions and Oyer and Terminer of Delaware

Date published: Jan 1, 1854

Citations

5 Del. 507 (Del. Gen. Sess. 1854)

Citing Cases

State v. Stephens

Despite the change in the constitutional provision governing the DAs, their duties as prescribed by law did…

State v. Rosenbaum

Upon taking the constitutional oath of office the appointee became "district attorney pro tem." State v.…