From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 21, 1991
575 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1991)

Opinion

No. 76054.

March 21, 1991.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We review Johnson v. State, 559 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), in which the court certified as one of great public importance the following question:

DOES THE MERE IDENTIFICATION OF A LOCATION AS A HIGH CRIME AREA UNDULY PREJUDICE A DEFENDANT WHO IS ARRESTED THERE?
Id. at 729. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have now answered the same question by stating that such an identification could be unduly prejudicial under some circumstances but is not always so. Gillion v. State, 573 So.2d 810 (Fla. 1991). We approve the decision below because it appears consistent with our opinion in Gillion.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 21, 1991
575 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM JOHNSON, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 21, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1991)

Citing Cases

E.M. v. State

E.M., pointing to numerous authorities, argues here that it was error to overrule his objections to the…

Wheeler v. State

Id. at 99. In Johnson v. State, 559 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990),approved, 575 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 1991), our…