From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jason

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Oct 28, 2015
872 N.W.2d 409 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

finding no indication the judge found threats credible or that judge was biased against defendant

Summary of this case from In re Interest of A.L.

Opinion

No. 14–1162.

10-28-2015

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Daniel JASON, Defendant–Appellant.

Mark C. Meyer, Cedar Rapids, for appellant. Daniel Jason, Clarinda, pro se. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, Janet Lyness, County Attorney, and Beth Beglin and Anne Lahey, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Jason

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Oct 28, 2015
872 N.W.2d 409 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

finding no indication the judge found threats credible or that judge was biased against defendant

Summary of this case from In re Interest of A.L.
Case details for

State v. Jason

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Daniel JASON, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Citations

872 N.W.2d 409 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

In re Interest of A.L.

We discern no abuse of discretion in this ruling. See State v. Jason, No. 14–1162, 2015 WL 6510334, at *6–7…