From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. James

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
May 29, 1967
198 So. 2d 693 (La. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. 7010.

April 17, 1967. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1967.

APPEAL FROM 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, COLEMAN LINDSEY, J.

Ponder Ponder, Anrite, for Relator.

Ben Daly Bridgeman, New Orleans, for Respondent.

Before LANDRY, ELLIS and BAILES, JJ.


This is a mandamus proceeding brought on the petition of the Citizens Finance Company of Hammond, Inc., against A. Clayton James, respondent, in his official capacity and position of Louisiana State Bank Commissioner, to compel him to issue a small loan license to relator, or to show cause why it should not issue. Following a hearing on relator's application for the writ of mandamus, the trial judge rendered judgment dismissing the demands of the relator at its costs. From this adverse judgment, relator has appealed.

The record reflects that the respondent, A. Clayton James, filed no answer to the relator's petition. In the absence of respondent's answer to relator's petition, no issue has been joined between the parties, and the matter is not properly before us at this time. See LSA-C.C.P. Article 2593 and Article 3783.

For the foregoing reason, the judgment appealed from is reversed and set aside, and this matter is remanded to trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. James

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
May 29, 1967
198 So. 2d 693 (La. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

State v. James

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel. CITIZENS FINANCE COMPANY OF HAMMOND, Inc.…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: May 29, 1967

Citations

198 So. 2d 693 (La. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

State v. James

Limited certiorari was directed to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, in order that we might review that…

State v. James

On appeal to this Court the matter was remanded to the court a quo for further proceedings for reasons not…