From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2019
2019-UP-327 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-327

10-09-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Michael Jackson, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-002103

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2019

Appeal From Richland County Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 9, 2019
2019-UP-327 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Michael Jackson, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-327 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)