From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Jackson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 9, 2019
Appellate Case No. 2017-002103 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-002103 Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-327

10-09-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Michael Jackson, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Richland County
Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Jackson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 9, 2019
Appellate Case No. 2017-002103 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Michael Jackson, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 2019

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2017-002103 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2019)