Summary
In Illig-Renn, we held that ORS 162.247(1)(b) survived a vagueness challenge under the state and federal constitutions because the statute was not unconstitutionally vague in all of its conceivable applications.
Summary of this case from State v. Illig-RennOpinion
No. S51573.
September 8, 2004.
(A114387) ( 189 Or App 47).
Petition for review allowed.
Respondent's petition for review allowed. The decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Ausmus, 336 Or 493, 85 P3d 864 (2004).