From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hurston

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 16, 1998
698 N.E.2d 979 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2677

Submitted August 19, 1998.

Decided September 16, 1998.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA-16217.

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Karen L. Sollars, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Raymond Hurston, pro se.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Rush (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hurston

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 16, 1998
698 N.E.2d 979 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State v. Hurston

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HURSTON, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 16, 1998

Citations

698 N.E.2d 979 (Ohio 1998)
83 Ohio St. 3d 110