From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hudson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 8, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36867 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2018)

Opinion

NO. A-1-CA-36867

08-08-2018

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HIRAM HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Hiram Hudson Roswell, NM Pro Se Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY
Dustin K. Hunter, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Hiram Hudson
Roswell, NM Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge /s/ _________
STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Hudson

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Aug 8, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36867 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HIRAM HUDSON…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Aug 8, 2018

Citations

NO. A-1-CA-36867 (N.M. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2018)