From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Huckelba

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 18, 2015
368 N.C. 569 (N.C. 2015)

Summary

reversing based solely on the defendant's failure to establish plain error in the jury instructions

Summary of this case from State v. Barnett

Opinion

No. 156A15.

12-18-2015

STATE of North Carolina v. Anna Laura HUCKELBA.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Edward Eldred, for defendant-appellee.


Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Edward Eldred, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

State v. Huckelba

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Dec 18, 2015
368 N.C. 569 (N.C. 2015)

reversing based solely on the defendant's failure to establish plain error in the jury instructions

Summary of this case from State v. Barnett
Case details for

State v. Huckelba

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANNA LAURA HUCKELBA

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Dec 18, 2015

Citations

368 N.C. 569 (N.C. 2015)
780 S.E.2d 750

Citing Cases

State v. French

Certainly, a "common law presumption against criminal liability without a showing of mens rea " exists. State…

State v. Reavis

Specifically, in State v. Huckelba , we observed that, where firearm possession was prohibited on educational…