From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hoxsey

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 203 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

concluding no prejudice on counsel's failure to inform the defendant of the actual amount of the surcharge

Summary of this case from State v. Iddings

Opinion

No. 16-1043

02-08-2017

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Gerald HOXSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Tindal of Nidey, Erdahl, Tindal & Fisher, PLC, Marengo, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sharon K. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Hoxsey

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 203 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

concluding no prejudice on counsel's failure to inform the defendant of the actual amount of the surcharge

Summary of this case from State v. Iddings

concluding no prejudice on counsel’s failure to inform the defendant of the actual amount of the surcharge

Summary of this case from State v. Delacy
Case details for

State v. Hoxsey

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Gerald HOXSEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

898 N.W.2d 203 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Weitzel

With the thirty-five-percent surcharge, the minimum fine would have been $843.75.State v. Hoxsey, No.…

State v. Iddings

Without attempting to develop a bright-line rule, in cases where the fine and corresponding surcharges have…