From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Houghton

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 5, 1983
655 P.2d 1103 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. C 82-03-34461, CA A25564

Argued and submitted December 17, 1982

Reversed and remanded for resentencing January 5, 1983

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Phillip J. Roth, Judge.

Phillip M. Margolin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing with instructions.


Defendant in this theft case appeals from the trial court's order of restitution, maintaining that a portion of the amount he is ordered to repay to his former employer is not supported by the record. We agree. Reversed and remanded for resentencing, with instructions to delete any restitution other than $4.15 per hour for hours of work claimed but not performed.


Summaries of

State v. Houghton

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 5, 1983
655 P.2d 1103 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Houghton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TERRY DONALD HOUGHTON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1983

Citations

655 P.2d 1103 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
655 P.2d 1103