From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hough

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 27, 2013
743 S.E.2d 174 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 141PA10.

2013-06-27

STATE of North Carolina v. Kerry McKinley HOUGH.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel D. Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. Robert W. Ewing, Clemmons, for defendant-appellant.


On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 202 N.C.App. 674, 690 S.E.2d 285 (2010), finding no error in judgments entered on 10 December 2008 by Judge Calvin E. Murphy in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel D. Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. Robert W. Ewing, Clemmons, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Hough

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 27, 2013
743 S.E.2d 174 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Hough

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Kerry McKinley HOUGH.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

Citations

743 S.E.2d 174 (N.C. 2013)
367 N.C. 79