From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Horry

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2010-163348 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-163348 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-248

06-12-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Willie Don Horry, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Charleston County

Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693-94 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]. Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal."); State v. Douglas, 380 S.C. 499, 502, 671 S.E.2d 606, 608 (2009) ("Lay witnesses are permitted to offer testimony in the form of opinions or inferences if the opinions or inferences are rationally based on the witness' perception, and will aid the jury in understanding testimony, and do not require special knowledge." (citing Rule 701, SCRE)); State v. Pagan, 369 S.C. 201, 212, 631 S.E.2d 262, 267 (2006) ("Generally, appellate courts will not set aside convictions due to insubstantial errors not affecting the result."); id. ("[A]n insubstantial error not affecting the result of the trial is harmless where 'guilt has been conclusively proven by competent evidence such that no other rational conclusion can be reached.'" (quoting State v. Bailey, 298 S.C. 1, 5, 377 S.E.2d 581, 584 (1989))). AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Horry

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 12, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2010-163348 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Horry

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Willie Don Horry, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 12, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2010-163348 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 12, 2013)