Opinion
NO. 19-KA-612
01-22-2020
STATE of Louisiana v. Michael P. HIDALGO
Defendant, Michael Hidalgo, appeals his conviction for first offense domestic abuse battery, in violation of La. R.S. 14:35.3. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss defendant's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellate jurisdiction extends only to cases that are triable by a jury. La. Const. Art. 5, § 10 ; La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1. To be eligible for trial by jury in a misdemeanor case, an accused must be faced with imprisonment for more than six months and/or a fine of more than one thousand dollars. La. C.Cr.P. art. 779 ; State v. Hunter , 15-69 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2/11/15), 168 So.3d 773, 774.
In the present case, after a bench trial on March 18, 2019, the trial judge found defendant guilty of first offense domestic abuse battery. The penalty provision for that offense is contained in La. R.S. 14:35.3(C), which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
On a first conviction, notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the offender shall be fined not less than three hundred dollars nor more than one thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned for not less than thirty days nor more than six months. At least forty-eight hours of the sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
Since defendant's offense is a misdemeanor offense not eligible for trial by jury , his conviction in not an appealable judgment. Under La. C.Cr.P. art. 912.1(C)(1), an application for a writ of review is the proper mechanism for seeking judicial review of a conviction on an offense not triable by a jury. See State v. Cotton , 14-419 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/24/14), 145 So.3d 533, 536.
It is noted that defendant was sentenced to three and one-half months in the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center, with the first forty-eight hours to be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. Defendant was also ordered to pay a fine of five hundred dollars.
--------
Accordingly, we dismiss the present appeal. We reserve, however, defendant's right to file a proper application of supervisory writs, in compliance with U.R.C.A. Rule 4-1 et seq. , within thirty days from the date of this opinion. Further, we hereby construe defendant's motion for appeal as a notice of intent to seek a supervisory writ, so defendant is not required to file a notice of intent nor obtain an order setting a return date pursuant to U.R.C.A. Rule 4-3.