From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hestand

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 10, 2007
218 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. WD 66543.

April 10, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry County, Missouri, William J. Roberts, Judge.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Craig A. Johnston, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Before HOWARD, C.J., and LOWENSTEIN and SPINDEN, JJ.


[Editor's Note: This opinon is subject to modification or transfer to the superme court.]


Order


After waiving his right to a jury trial, Richard Hestand was convicted of three counts of assault in the first degree under RSMo. section 565.050 (2000), for repeatedly ramming the truck he was driving into another occupied truck. He now appeals that conviction arguing that the court lacked sufficient evidence to find him guilty of the three separate counts of assault and that the trial court erred in failing to sua sponte respond to a misstatement of law in closing arguments. Both claims are unpreserved and reviewed under Supreme Court Rule 30.20 for plain error.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Hestand

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 10, 2007
218 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Hestand

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard Eugene HESTAND, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Apr 10, 2007

Citations

218 S.W.3d 625 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)