From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Henley

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 4, 1977
569 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 20588, CA 8336

Argued September 21, affirmed October 4, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Deschutes County.

J. R. Campbell, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Donald L. Paillette, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


The thrust of defendant's assignment of error in this case is incompetent performance by his trial counsel. As we noted in State v. Robinson, 25 Or. App. 675, 550 P.2d 758 (1976), this issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. This is not one of those instances.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Henley

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 4, 1977
569 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Henley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CLYDE HENLEY, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 4, 1977

Citations

569 P.2d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
569 P.2d 58

Citing Cases

State v. Windress

The substance of his motion is that his trial counsel was "grossly negligent" in conducting the defense. That…

State v. Myhrvold

Affirmed. See State v. Henley, 31 Or. App. 109, 569 P.2d 58 (1977).…