From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Henderson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 3, 1993
124 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

90-1220; CA A68494

On respondent's motion for reconsideration filed August 31, reconsideration allowed; opinion ( 116 Or. App. 604, 843 P.2d 459 (1992)) modified; affirmed November 3, 1993

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County, Raymond Bagley, Judge.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.

No appearance contra.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.


The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion in this case. 116 Or. App. 604, 843 P.2d 459 (1992). Defendant was convicted of murder. On appeal, he challenged his sentence of life imprisonment with a 25-year minimum term pursuant to ORS 163.115. We affirmed the conviction and remanded for resentencing. We allow the state's motion, and affirm defendant's sentence.

Defendant was originally charged by an eight count indictment with several counts of aggravated murder, murder and felony murder. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he agreed to plead guilty to the count charging intentional murder with a firearm in return for dismissal of the other charges. He also agreed that the parties would "stipulate to matrix gridblock 11 I (120-121 months)."

Shortly after we issued our opinion, the Supreme Court held that ORS 138.222(2)(d) precludes appellate review of a sentence that results from a plea bargain. State v. Adams, 315 Or. 359, 847 P.2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or. App. 462, 852 P.2d 935 (1993); see also State v. Johnston, 120 Or. App. 165, 851 P.2d 1156, rev den 317 Or. 272 (1993). We were without authority to review defendant's claim that the court erred in sentencing him. Accordingly, we affirm defendant's sentence.

The 1993 legislature subsequently amended ORS 138.222(2)(d). Or Laws 1993, ch 698. That law becomes effective November 4, 1993.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Henderson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 3, 1993
124 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN KENNETH HENDERSON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 3, 1993

Citations

124 Or. App. 426 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
861 P.2d 406

Citing Cases

Henderson v. Lampert

On the state's motion for reconsideration, the court of appeals determined that it was without authority to…