Opinion
No. 204P13.
2013-08-27
STATE of North Carolina v. James Lamont HAZEL.
Marilyn G. Ozer, for Hazel, James Lamont. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North.
Marilyn G. Ozer, for Hazel, James Lamont. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of North.
Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of North.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th of May 2013 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2013”
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of May 2013 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2013”